Journal cover Journal topic
Mechanical Sciences An open-access journal for theoretical and applied mechanics
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.052 IF 1.052
  • IF 5-year value: 1.567 IF 5-year
    1.567
  • CiteScore value: 1.92 CiteScore
    1.92
  • SNIP value: 1.214 SNIP 1.214
  • IPP value: 1.47 IPP 1.47
  • SJR value: 0.367 SJR 0.367
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 18 Scimago H
    index 18
  • h5-index value: 16 h5-index 16
Supported by
Logo Library of Delft University of Technology Logo NWO
Affiliated to
Logo iftomm
Volume 6, issue 2
Mech. Sci., 6, 173-179, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-6-173-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Mech. Sci., 6, 173-179, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-6-173-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 09 Sep 2015

Research article | 09 Sep 2015

Biomechanical comparison using finite element analysis of different screw configurations in the fixation of femoral neck fractures

K. Gok1 and S. Inal2 K. Gok and S. Inal
  • 1Dumlupinar University, Kütahya Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Germiyan Campus, 43110 Kütahya, Turkey
  • 2Dumlupinar University, School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Campus of Evliya Celebi, 43100 Kütahya, Turkey

Abstract. In this research, biomechanical behaviors of five different configurations of screws used for stabilization of femoral neck fracture under axial loading have been examined, and which configuration is best has been investigated. A point cloud was obtained after scanning the human femoral model with a three dimensional (3-D) scanner, and this point cloud was converted to a 3-D femoral model by Geomagic Studio software. Femoral neck fracture was modeled by SolidWorks software for five different configurations: dual parallel, triple parallel, triangle, inverted triangle and square, and computer-aided numerical analysis of different configurations were carried out by ANSYS Workbench finite element analysis (FEA) software. For each configuration, mesh process, loading status (axial), boundary conditions and material model were applied in finite element analysis software. Von Mises stress values in the upper and lower proximity of the femur and screws were calculated. According to FEA results, it was particularly advantageous to use the fixation type of triangle configuration. The lowest values are found as 223.32 MPa at the lower, 63.34 MPa at the upper proximity and 493.24 MPa at the screws in triangle configuration. This showed that this configuration creates minimum stress at the upper and lower proximity of the fracture line. Clinically, we believe that the lowest stress values which are created by triangle configuration encompass the most advantageous method. In clinical practices, it is believed that using more than three screws does not provide any benefit. Furthermore, the highest stresses are as follows: at upper proximity 394.79 MPa in triple parallel configuration, for lower proximity 651.2 MPa in square configuration and for screw 2459 MPa in inverted triangle.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share